When a company wants to “use AI with their data,” they often ask: “Do we need to train a model?” In most cases, no. Training (fine-tuning) is expensive, requires expertise, and above all, it’s not the best way to ensure that AI correctly cites procedures, price lists, and updated FAQs.<\/p>\n
This is where RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) comes in: an approach that allows a language model to consult your documents before responding.<\/p>\n
Why “training the model” isn’t the answer
\nFine-tuning is useful when you want to structurally change behaviors and style (e.g., labeling, a very specific tone, a repetitive task). But if the issue is “it needs to know our updated policies,” fine-tuning is inefficient:<\/p>\n
Every change requires a new cycle;
\nyou risk “incorporating” obsolete information;
\nyou don’t have timely citations of the document.<\/p>\n
RAG, on the other hand, uses documents as an updated external source.<\/p>\n
What is RAG in simple terms?
\nRAG = Search + Generation.<\/p>\n
When you ask a question, the system searches your documents for relevant passages (retrieval).
\nThen the model generates the answer using those passages as context.
\nThe goal isn’t to “make the AI \u200b\u200ban expert”: it’s to make it answer with evidence.<\/p>\n
Components: Documents, Chunks, Embeddings, Vector DB
\nTo make a RAG work well, you need to address three aspects.<\/p>\n
1) Documents<\/p>\n
PDFs, wikis, manuals, email templates, policies: all are fine, but better if:<\/p>\n
updated;<\/p>\n
versioned;
\nstructured (titles, sections).
\n2) Chunking<\/p>\n
Documents are broken into chunks. If the chunks are too large, you recover useless content; if they’re too small, you lose context.<\/p>\n
Practical guidelines:<\/p>\n
Chunk 300\u2013800 words (depends on the domain);
\n10\u201320% overlap to avoid breaking concepts;
\nstore titles and paragraphs as metadata.
\n3) Embeddings<\/p>\n
Embeddings are numerical representations that capture “semantic similarity.” Your query is transformed into an embedding and compared with those of the chunks to find the most similar ones.<\/p>\n
For you, in practice, this means: if you ask for “return policy,” the system also finds chunks that mention “returned merchandise” or “RMA,” even if they don’t use the same word.<\/p>\n
Vector database<\/p>\n
It is used to store and search for embeddings efficiently (even a simple database can suffice initially, but for scaling, a dedicated solution is recommended).<\/p>\n
Retrieval: how to find the right chunks
\n“Na\u00efve” retrieval takes the top-k most similar chunks. In your company, it’s worth improving:<\/p>\n
Metadata and filters: department=support, language=IT, version=2026.
\nRe-ranking: A second phase that reorders results with a more precise model.
\nHybrid search: Combining keyword and semantic search.
\nExample: For a product catalog, brand\/model filters increase precision and reduce hallucinations.<\/p>\n
Prompts and citations: How to make output reliable
\nA robust RAG doesn’t just say “here’s the answer”: it also includes where it comes from. Two useful techniques:<\/p>\n
Explicitly ask: “Cite sources with document title and section.”
\nConstraint: “If you don’t find it in the documents, say you don’t know and ask for clarification.”
\nYou can also force a format:<\/p>\n
Short answer
\nRelevant passages (quote)
\nNext actions
\nCommon mistakes and quality checklists
\nTypical errors:<\/p>\n
Dirty documents (scanned PDFs with no text). Solution: OCR.
\nContextless chunks (tables only). Solution: Add titles and supporting rows.
\nUnversioned data: AI fishes out old policies. Solution: “valid_from\/valid_to” metadata.
\nTop-k too low: poor recovery. Solution: Increase and use re-ranking.
\nPermissive prompt: the model “completes” with imagination. Solution: rules and citations.
\nQuick checklist:<\/p>\n
Does it always retrieve the right sources on 20 test questions?
\nDo the answers cite real sections?
\nIf a document is missing, does the AI \u200b\u200badmit it?
\n5-step mini-project for an SME
\nSelect 30\u201350 core documents.
\nClean and structure (titles, versions, OCR).
\nChunking + embedding + indexing.
\nTest queries: 50 real questions (support\/sales).
\nDeploy to production with logging and feedback loop.
\nRAG is the bridge between “generic AI” and “AI useful in the enterprise.” You don’t need to be a big tech company: you need organized documents and a simple but well-controlled pipeline.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
When a company wants to “use AI with their data,” they often ask: “Do we need to train a model?” In most cases, no. Training…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":20471,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3710],"tags":[],"yst_prominent_words":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ottobix.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21260"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ottobix.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ottobix.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ottobix.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ottobix.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ottobix.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21260\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ottobix.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20471"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ottobix.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ottobix.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ottobix.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21260"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ottobix.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=21260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}